Saturday, November 27th, 2010
272 Comments
|
Louisville police officer arrested after incident at Molly Malone's |
RE: Louisville police officer arrested after incident at Molly...
Exactly as I said.
You are and Embarassment
RE: Louisville police officer arrested after incident at Molly...
You represent yourself as an officer, so therefore an embarrassment to the LMPD, so all of us.
How? by the posts you make.
Like it or not we represent each other. That means others represent You also.
And obviously you have no pride or tact whatsoever.
Would you have these conversations in a public forumn? meaning with people sitting with you that you do not know?
If you cite this internet forumn as part of your answer then you sir have no morals that I had been raised with, as far as how I try to act even if I know I am not being watched.
When you publicly name people without them not being able t defend themselves that make you a coward hiding behind your screen name. And before you accuse me of the same, I am not trashing a person's name publicly here. So far you and Anon have accomplished the equivilant of driving around around with a bullhorn spreading gossip then driving off.
Then you pull the "if you don't like it leave". Well that acvtivity was not practiced on this site as much until now.
So yeah, there are people here reading this because it is unfolding on front of them.
And is seems you do not care how it looks to the rest of us.
Good bye
-
Oh and Flaimebait, You ,and persons gett...
13 years ago
-
You guys said there is a sheet to sign i...
13 years ago
-
LMAO....Im sure their is! Doubt its that...
13 years ago
- Great news!! I'm next!! Some guy that's ... 13 years ago
-
LMAO....Im sure their is! Doubt its that...
13 years ago
-
You guys said there is a sheet to sign i...
13 years ago
RE: Louisville police officer arrested after incident at Molly...
I'm curious, if it is such a joke, why are you even looking at it? I assume you are not going to respond to this post because you have sworn off of it?
Trading sex for favors is between the two involved - until it turns into a sexual harassment lawsuit when the giver doesn't get something they want and the receiver of the favor is a supervisor. So, yes, it is the business of the department. It should be absolutely PROHIBITED between training officers and their trainees - who are their supervisors for the duration of training and until they are officially released. And if you know about it, and can prove it, and don't do something about it, you have only yourself to blame for it.