Mayor defends $94,000 hire amid job freeze

No, you simply refuse to acknowledge them so they do not interfere with your agenda. It's no wonder these guys throw childish antics at you, you are not here for a real debate. You are only here tyring to achieve validation to your slanted point of view. You have been given real, legit reasons to your questions, but you have ignored them if they do not fall to where you can't slant them fit your text. You want credible responses? Try debating every response, not just the ones you can break apart to fit the agenda of yours, you know the one. It is the oldest story in the book. You recieved a speeding ticket, then you saw an officer speeding, and your perception was it was so he could eat. And when you recieved the circumstances behind that incident, you ignored it, because it did not fit your perception.

Like the shoplifter. I sir, was there also. What you did not hear was the officer relaying on the radio what the criminal had committed, where he was going etc. Because of your slanted perception, you cannot understand, nor do you choose to, ALL the events that took place. Because of your attitude, all you saw was a circumstance that only involved the interests of the police. You refuse to educate yourself on the KRS statutes that apply to that particular incident that would warrant the responses the officers involved had to decide thier action. Then you want to hold officers accountable to your perception? I hardly think not. You will not allow yourself to be subject to that type of questioning, you have shown that, why do you expect that of others?

You come here out of frustration and disgust.