Abramson's cronies try to spread muck about the Police

I have never spoken for anyone BUT myself here. Yes I was blocked, and I found it funny that a website created with anonymity for the purpose of protecting the speech of others without censorship would take the step to ban someone. That issue has been dealt with.

If people are talking publicly, and loud enough to be heard, then I wouldnt have a problem politely intervening in their conversation, as I wouldnt have a problem with someone intervening in mine. If I am having a conversation that I do not want intruded upon, then it is up to me to have that conversation in a place that is safe from intrusion.

People have proven to me that they have less of a problem with people joining their conversations when in agreement, than if people are joining in with an opposing view. I know that when I have an opinion, it isnt rushed to judgment. I know that when I have an opinion it is thought out, but not set in stone so that I wouldnt accept an opposing view.

For all the names implying a failure to make a point, I dont heed it. It isnt because of ego, its because I know that my points are thorough. When many of you here take the time to try and tell me that no one cares what I have to say, well, youre choosing to forget that there have in fact been people here who agreed with me if only in theory and not in practice. People dont have to like my delivery in order to support my message. When you choose to speak for other people especially appointing yourself to do so, you only end up looking like a fool.

I have never once lost sight of what I say being my own opinion, as you have never heard me claim to speak for anyone else.