Wednesday, September 5th, 2012
127 Comments
|
LMPD investigates shooting by off-duty officer |
RE: LMPD investigates shooting by off-duty officer
September 6th, 2012 @ 7:32PM (12 years ago)
There are several reasons you could justify shooting and "unarmed" man. I so tired of hearing that crap!
RE: LMPD investigates shooting by off-duty officer
September 6th, 2012 @ 7:40PM (12 years ago)
Sue LMPD? Really?
What has LMPD done?
RE: LMPD investigates shooting by off-duty officer
September 6th, 2012 @ 7:59PM (12 years ago)
You are right. The 2 commenters above me are NAIVE!
Yes. Unarmed guy reached for cops gun. Admitted to doing so. But none of that would matter to a jury now that it has come out cop was drunk driving his police car off duty and claimed his position in defense of his actions in a road rage incident. No doubt LMPD will be sued. And no doubt they will settle outside of court. You guys clearly don't get what the poster was conveying at all
-
Not trying to pick a fight. I really wan...
12 years ago
-
They will argue negligence on LMPD's par...
12 years ago
- exactly. not to mention he was in his de... 12 years ago
-
"failure to properly train". He was not ...
12 years ago
-
failure to properly supervise is a gray ...
12 years ago
-
do any supervisors actully supervise? No...
12 years ago
-
How you figure that?
12 years ago
-
Last time I looked I am a POLICE OFFICER...
12 years ago
-
You are NOT a police officer 24/7 in the...
12 years ago
- A lot of departments want their cake and... 12 years ago
- But he was driving a city vehicle right?... 12 years ago
-
You are NOT a police officer 24/7 in the...
12 years ago
-
Last time I looked I am a POLICE OFFICER...
12 years ago
-
How you figure that?
12 years ago
-
do any supervisors actully supervise? No...
12 years ago
-
failure to properly supervise is a gray ...
12 years ago
-
They will argue negligence on LMPD's par...
12 years ago