I'm not trying to be critical of your post, but one thing I'm always curious about is why writers on here never offer solutions. They only offer criticisms and want to tell the rest of us how we don't get it or that those in the staff should always be someone else. 1.Who is "them"? 2. Who are those "promoted for politics"? Please explain in specifics. 3. Who is the "they" in paragraph 2? 4. You make an assumption that folks do things "for the command staff". Can you explain? 5. You say it isn't
I'm not trying to be critical of your post, but one thing I'm always curious about is why writers on here never offer solutions. They only offer criticisms and want to tell the rest of us how we don't get it or that those in the staff should always be someone else. 1.Who is "them"? 2. Who are those "promoted for politics"? Please explain in specifics. 3. Who is the "they" in paragraph 2? 4. You make an assumption that folks do things "for the command staff". Can you explain? 5. You say it isn't