You have made very valid points, It seems we agree one more points than I origially assumed. I must still stand by my original stance. The City/county "battles" bleed over to the newer officers ad usually influence those that "do not have dog in the fight". I still feel it is irresponsible for the former two to let that happen. Most of the time it is done purposely, one could say out of spite. Thier negative differences should not spill over. Denying it happens only keeps the negativity going. My
You have made very valid points, It seems we agree one more points than I origially assumed. I must still stand by my original stance. The City/county "battles" bleed over to the newer officers ad usually influence those that "do not have dog in the fight". I still feel it is irresponsible for the former two to let that happen. Most of the time it is done purposely, one could say out of spite. Thier negative differences should not spill over. Denying it happens only keeps the negativity going. My