Why do people keep saying Marlowe needs to be fired when there is nothing she is accused of been proven? She was the subject of a PIU investigation (criminal) which apparently yielded no criminal conduct. Remember, just because someone says it happened, doesn't mean it happened. Also, let's face it, Chief White fired Dison because of Dison's defiance. How the hell does someone get 19 days suspension in 2007 that could have lead to termination do the same thing in 2010? I don't think the Chief necessarily