But the problem is, no one should have been standing IN FRONT of the car in the first place - sorry, that was just "plum stupid." And if they weren't standing in front, there was no justification to shoot the guy. He was a good case of good riddance, I agree, but it was still a FU from beginning to end on that one. (What about the rule of securing the stolen car BEFORE you make contact with the suspect?)
But the problem is, no one should have been standing IN FRONT of the car in the first place - sorry, that was just "plum stupid." And if they weren't standing in front, there was no justification to shoot the guy. He was a good case of good riddance, I agree, but it was still a FU from beginning to end on that one. (What about the rule of securing the stolen car BEFORE you make contact with the suspect?)