Precisely. And they aren't "wanting us to pay" - we ARE paying, at least 30, if not 60. (The injunction only dealt with the most recent increase.) And by law, we could have been requesting it all along, but it was understood that was the tradeoff for the cars. Since we are now being expected to pay for the cars, they can pay (and are required to do so) for the offduty stops we are required to make. That's the one thing that we have in our favor, the policy requires us to work when we aren't on duty,
Precisely. And they aren't "wanting us to pay" - we ARE paying, at least 30, if not 60. (The injunction only dealt with the most recent increase.) And by law, we could have been requesting it all along, but it was understood that was the tradeoff for the cars. Since we are now being expected to pay for the cars, they can pay (and are required to do so) for the offduty stops we are required to make. That's the one thing that we have in our favor, the policy requires us to work when we aren't on duty,