S.W.A.T Team Shake-Up

That was a different comment. Apparently you think that the only purpose of articles on the website are to cause division. That is far frim what I have read here. The comments that people made are their own. The article only pointed out that there seems to be a problem.

If you have followed some of the stories you'll notice that a lot of them come back to a central theme. There are decisions being made before they are thought out or before someone asks the people affected how they feel about it.

I don't think Dotson has ever written an article on this website anyway. People can submit stories and they are approved by the webmaster.

The good thing about this article is that it has opened some peoples eyes to yet another problem. Whenever there is controvery then people respond more.

I like all the information that is obtained from the articles and from the comments, although some of them seem to push the limit.

If I were to tell someone I didn't like them, I would tell them to their face or at least post my name.

What was wrong with the article. It was a simple news brief. Get a life pal! The FOP has nothing to due with bad feelings either way from former City or County. I happen to be former City and have no problem with former County. I don't see you comment as constructive in any way. In case you forgot this is the FOP website and I like hearing about what goes because the truth isn't comming out of the front office nor is it being printed in the paper.

I am not about to go out and start giving group hugs to someone that is bitter over merger. I don't think it was a bad idea, they have just screwed it up so bad it isn't funny at all.

The Officers on the street all get along. I firmly believe that it wil take more time to work some of the issues out, but without the FOP providing this outlet then we would be in even worse shape.

KEEP UP THE GODD WORK GUYS! THIS SITE ROCKS!

To answer your question...No I do not seek approval for content...I wrote the article and it is no way biased against either side...It is informational only.

Chris Ansman