Wednesday, September 2nd, 2015
163 Comments
|
Police chief defends pending patrol changes |
RE: Police chief defends pending patrol changes
September 6th, 2015 @ 1:18PM (9 years ago)
There is no contract violation. The allegation is that Metro is violating state law. The promotional process is governed by merit board rules and state law. Has nothing to do with the contract. However, if Metro were allegedly violating the contract, no it doesn't mean the general membership could revisit or reopen the contract. Not sure where you heard that but it's not correct. The proper way to respond to contract violations is to file a grievance. If the FOP is not satisfied with the answer it may apply for arbitration. If not satisfied with the arbitration decision it may file in circuit court.
-
The promotional process is discussed in ...
9 years ago
- I see where you're going with this. The... 9 years ago