That's confusing. You say, "...they convicted him with previously." Well, if he is convicted, why then, would the prosecution be using "the same evidence" at all? Once he is convicted, there is no previous evidence to use.
That's confusing. You say, "...they convicted him with previously." Well, if he is convicted, why then, would the prosecution be using "the same evidence" at all? Once he is convicted, there is no previous evidence to use.