Thursday, June 13th, 2013
143 Comments
|
Metrosafe criticized following latest Rubbertown chemical leak |
RE: Metrosafe criticized following latest Rubbertown chemical...
There are several officers that are volunteer fireman in the county districts.
Not saying that was the case with what/who you saw, but something to consider.
RE: Metrosafe criticized following latest Rubbertown chemical...
Maybe they were Arson. I Don't really mind if they carry, even if they are just regular firemen. Nobody associates firemen with police. So there is no mistaking them for the police.
- Good point. 11 years ago
-
why does arson have guns?
11 years ago
- because tbey are sworn police officers t... 11 years ago
-
cuz bad people often start fires to cove...
11 years ago
-
They also arrest people for arson. I hop...
11 years ago
-
Oh but I am a police officer. So there! ...
11 years ago
- You should know why Arson Invest, have p... 11 years ago
-
Oh but I am a police officer. So there! ...
11 years ago
-
They also arrest people for arson. I hop...
11 years ago
RE: Metrosafe criticized following latest Rubbertown chemical...
Well you know just a few weeks ago firemen were collecting large sums of money for Crusade for Children. Not a bad idea, really.
RE: Metrosafe criticized following latest Rubbertown chemical...
I have absolutely no problem with firefighters carrying. Or law abiding citizens who are not violating the law. If your delicate sensibilities cannot handle lawful gun ownership, possession and display, you need to get out of law enforcement. What a pansy. So let me guess. It is ok for you but not ok for anyone else. You must be a Lainhart.