You are not seeing the point. What you are doing is advocating avoiding reading someone their rights. You are not doing it in good faith and if that can be proven, you are going to have your statement suppressed. You are basically abusing a loophole. There is a reason that method is not taught in ANY police interview courses. Officers who talk about it do so in secrecy because they know it is a form of abuse. Don't take my word for, ask any competent prosecutor their opinion on this. I think you'll
You are not seeing the point. What you are doing is advocating avoiding reading someone their rights. You are not doing it in good faith and if that can be proven, you are going to have your statement suppressed. You are basically abusing a loophole. There is a reason that method is not taught in ANY police interview courses. Officers who talk about it do so in secrecy because they know it is a form of abuse. Don't take my word for, ask any competent prosecutor their opinion on this. I think you'll