I am not sure which is worse the fact that this Officer , who has sworn an oath to uphold the law and defend the Constitution, joined an organization that is not only known for it stance against certain laws they feel should not apply to them, but also for its history of violating peoples Constitutional Rights, when they felt like it, due to that person's race, creed, religion, politics, orientation, etc. Or the fact that the Nebraska State Trooper's Union felt that this is the type of person should
I am not sure which is worse the fact that this Officer , who has sworn an oath to uphold the law and defend the Constitution, joined an organization that is not only known for it stance against certain laws they feel should not apply to them, but also for its history of violating peoples Constitutional Rights, when they felt like it, due to that person's race, creed, religion, politics, orientation, etc. Or the fact that the Nebraska State Trooper's Union felt that this is the type of person should